Comments on: Five Horrible Arguments for Circumcision

By: SharkCat

SharkCat — Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:18:39 +0000

I love how you debunk these 5 arguements in your article. I’d like to say that there’s a sixth reason, too, and that is: sometimes the circumcision is done incorrectly. Circumcision is wrong, but it’s even worst if it’s done incorrectly. I was circumcised as an infant, and it was done incorrectly, apparently because some of the foreskin was left. I had to get an operation at age 7 to fix it, which was a horrible idea. I’m still not clear as to if it was the original circumcision that creates the problems I have now or the second surgery, but up until I was 12 the scar would open at times, causing intense pain that lasted for days. There’s more skin on one side than the other, and whenever I get an erection it’s bent at a wierd angle. There are small chunks of flesh missing from the glans, I can barely feel any pleasure during intercourse, and from time to time the scar starts hurting– I don’t really know why. Also, the wound healed in a wierd way so that now there’s some sort of hole in one part of the circumcision scar that resembles something you would put an earing in.

By: Circumcision | 10 Stupid Reasons For Circumcision | VizFact Dot Com

Circumcision | 10 Stupid Reasons For Circumcision | VizFact Dot Com — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:43:34 +0000

[...] This is the biggest lie of all time. Penis foreskin has millions of nerve endings which allow for increased sexual sensation and have been proven to aid the male in riding the wave of an orgasm resulting in lower chances of premature ejaculation. In other words, minute men are likely circumcised men. Also, I have read that circumcision only benefits how the sexual stimulation of gay men. [...]

By: Briana

Briana — Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:37:54 +0000

Ahhh, the good ol fashion argument: your thoughts, opinions, religion, and world views are wrong because I say so. If parents shouldn’t be “allowed” to circumcise their sons, even for religious reasons, then I guess they shouldn’t baptize babies either. It’s the same thing: you’re doing something to someone else’s body without their permission for a stupid thing like religion. And I also presume that getting your infant daughter’s ears pierced well be the next heathen act to be chopped. (I wouldn’t mind that one actually, I think it’s horrible & degrades the girl) we also should ban parents from dressing their children. you’re making a decision for the child and smothering their creativity, which could have life long emotional effects, for all you know. Lets ban spankings too, those are mean. Infact, lets just take everyone’s kids away until they can be brainwashed into all believing the same things. My point here people is that you cannot force your opinions on others. It makes you just as bad as the bible thumpers who condemn everyone around them. For example, theres a culture that believes in female circumcision. I believe it’s completely wrong, but just because *I* think that way doesn’t make me right. It doesn’t mean I should go condemn these people and their beliefs and try to take their rights away. You don’t believe in circumcision, great! But don’t lobby to take away people’s rights. You have to realize that by trying to take away the rights of a few, you will harm the many. It’ll snowball into this extreme thing and, before you know it, no one will be able to do anything. You think you’re so enlightened, and are so busy patting yourself on the back, that you don’t see how many freedoms you are so willing to give up. Parents should have every freedom to raise their children as they see fit. Why? Because if societal views can control what parents are allowed to do, then YOU aren’t really the one raising your child -popular opinion is. Long story short, look at the bigger picture, stop forcing your beliefs on to others, and learn some humble tolerance.

By: dondioni

dondioni — Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:51:40 +0000

I was circum. at 23 yrs old religoius reasons.
within 1 month my knob end had gained abut 1/2 inch in dia and 1/4 in length, looked much better.
46 years later I am very pleased witrh my equipment,
I stil enjoy sex for up to 40 45 mins almost every day

By: Thomas

Thomas — Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:51:16 +0000

I really like the argument ““Circumcised is easier to clean!”” because it is the equivalent of going, “Well your teeth would be easier to clean if you didn’t have those cheeks.” NO SHIT! DOESN’T MEAN YOU SHOULD SLICE YOUR CHEEKS OFF.

By: aMum

aMum — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:09:15 +0000

Wow sensitive subject, but one that MUST be discussed. I almost went along with cirsumcizing my son, thought it was the norm no big deal, but when I pushed him out of my body & held him I went hold on, NO ONE is going to cut anything from ‘his” organ, if not necessary. Did research as anyone should do before a surgery & realized we live in a time with running water & it is not hard to keep clean. There are nerve ending that will be cut off, sex for him could be not so great later in life. Read that the foreskin is a PROTECTIVE covering like your eyelids. Things CAN go wrong during the procedure or after such as death, babies have died from this. So all the hard work I did nurturing child in womb was not going to risk his life or his future happiness. God doesn’t make mistakes, but man does. He was born that way & didn’t think it was up to me or his Father to alter his perfection. Although don’t get me wrong can understand why the Egyptians started doing it in the 1st place, plumbing was nil back then & while so young so it heals quicker. Interesting how it does change the look of it all, but my only concern was protecting my son. My Motherly Instinct. It does not bother me when people make ignorant comments. Why make fun of a penis that does not belong to them? My son’s penis is his own, not his parents so would not make that decision for him. He is his own man & a fully intact one until he chooses otherwise, but would insist he did his research 1st before making such an alteration on his manhood.

By: Mike

Mike — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 04:09:10 +0000

It was nice of Ali to illustrate how wars continue to be fought over just this issue. I’ve been harangued by an Indian (Hindu) teenager about how Pakistanis are primitive, uncivilized dogs — his father told him — because they’re circumcised. I’m guessing Ali heard a diffferent story from his father.

Remember this the next time you hear about fighting over Kashmir. And also that India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons.

By: Dan Soucy

Dan Soucy — Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:27:08 +0000

personally, i agree with ali. bran doesn’t know shit about pleasuring a woman.

By: MamaJasmine

MamaJasmine — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:44:53 +0000

I have had multiple partners of cut and uncut men and I can honestly say that there was never an issue with cleanliness for the uncut men, in my experience. I personally enjoy uncut men more because I see a difference in regards to the way they respond to sensations…its just what I prefer. As to the person who said they are filthy..the only thing you proved with your rude comments was that you are not comfortable with sex yourself.. you should just stop having it NOW.

By: Bran Rainey

Bran Rainey — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:03:16 +0000

“If you think a cut man is better sexually, you are free to that opinion, but truly that makes me guess that you’ve never been with a man that has a WHOLE penis. Why would you want only half the prize when you could have it all?”

^– This is even more stupid than Ali’s comment. I’m irritated that you think we agree with one another.